This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

ISPM 27- Annex 1

This diagnostic protocol was adopted by the Fifth Session of the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures in March 2010.


                                     The annex is a prescriptive part of ISPM 27:2006.

                                 

      INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR  PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES


                                                                 ISPM 27
                                                                Annex 1


                                           ISPM 27 DIAGNOSTIC PROTOCOLS
 

                                                                  DP 1:
                                                  Thrips palmi Karny
 


                                                               (2010)



 CONTENTS
1. Pest Information ..................................................................................................................... DP 1-2
2. Taxonomic Information .......................................................................................................... DP 1-3
3. Detection ................................................................................................................................. DP 1-3
4. Identification ........................................................................................................................... DP 1-4
4.1 Morphological identification of the adult thrips ...................................................... DP 1-5
4.1.1 Preparation of thrips for microscopic examination ................................................. DP 1-5
4.1.2 Identification of the family Thripidae ..................................................................... DP 1-5
4.1.3 Identification of the genus Thrips ........................................................................... DP 1-5
4.1.4 Identification of Thrips palmi ................................................................................. DP 1-7
4.1.4.1 Morphological characteristics of Thrips palmi ....................................................... DP 1-7
4.1.4.2 Comparison with similar species (species that are yellow without darker body
markings, or predominantly yellow, or sometimes yellow) .................................... DP 1-8
4.2 Molecular assays for identifying Thrips palmi ...................................................... DP 1-16
4.2.1 SCAR marker-generated sequence-based real-time PCR assay for Thrips palmi . DP 1-16
4.2.2 COI sequence-based real-time PCR assay for Thrips palmi ................................. DP 1-17
4.2.3 ITS2 sequence-based PCR-RFLP assay for nine species of thrips including Thrips
palmi ...................................................................................................................... DP 1-17
4.2.4 COI sequence-based PCR-RFLP assay for ten species of thrips including Thrips
palmi ...................................................................................................................... DP 1-18
5. Records ................................................................................................................................. DP 1-19
6. Contact points for further information .................................................................................. DP 1-19
7. Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. DP 1-19
8. References ............................................................................................................................ DP 1-19



 1. Pest Information
Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) is a polyphagous plant pest, especially of species in the
Cucurbitaceae and Solanaceae. It appears to have originated in Southern Asia and to have spread from
there during the latter part of the twentieth century. It has been recorded throughout Asia and is
widespread throughout the Pacific and the Caribbean. It has been recorded locally in North, Central
and South America and Africa. For more general information about T. palmi, see EPPO/CABI (1997)
or Murai (2002); online pest data sheets are also available from the Pests and Diseases Image Library
(PaDIL, 2007) and EPPO (EPPO, 2008).
The species causes economic damage to plant crops both as a direct result of its feeding activity and
from its ability to vector tospoviruses such as Groundnut bud necrosis virus, Melon yellow spot virus
and Watermelon silver mottle virus. It is extremely polyphagous, and has been recorded from more
than 36 plant families. It is an outdoor pest of, amongst others, Benincasa hispida, Capsicum annuum,
Citrullus lanatus, Cucumis melo, Cucumis sativus, Cucurbita spp., Glycine max, Gossypium spp.,
Helianthus annuus, Nicotiana tabacum, Phaseolus vulgaris, Pisum sativum, Sesamum indicum,
Solanum melongena, Solanum tuberosum and Vigna unguiculata. In glasshouses, economically
important hosts are Capsicum annuum, Chrysanthemum spp., Cucumis sativus, Cyclamen spp., Ficus
spp., Orchidaceae and Solanum melongena. The thrips may be carried on plants for planting, cut
flowers and fruits of host species, as well as on or associated with packing material, and in soil.
Thrips palmi is almost entirely yellow in coloration (Figures 1–3), and its identification is hampered
by both its small size (1.0–1.3 mm) and its great similarity to certain other yellow or predominantly
yellow species of Thrips.
 






Figure 1: Thrips palmi, female (left) and male (photo: A. J. M. Loomans, PPS, Wageningen, the Netherlands;
scale bar = 500 μm = 0.5 mm)





Figure 2: Thrips palmi, female
Figure 3: Thrips palmi, male
(Photos: W. Zijlstra, PPS, Wageningen, the Netherlands; scale bars: 300 μm)


 2. Taxonomic Information
Name: Thrips palmi Karny, 1925
Synonyms: Thrips clarus Moulton, 1928
Thrips leucadophilus Priesner, 1936
Thrips gossypicola Ramakrishna & Margabandhu, 1939
Chloethrips aureus Ananthakrishnan & Jagadish, 1967
Thrips gracilis Ananthakrishnan & Jagadish, 1968
Taxonomic position: Insecta, Thysanoptera, Terebrantia, Thripidae
Common name: melon thrips
3. Detection
Thrips palmi may be found in different locations depending on the life stages present.
eggs in the leaf, flower and fruit tissue
larva I on the leaves, flowers and fruits
larva II on the leaves, flowers and fruits
pupa I in the soil, packing cases and growing medium
pupa II in the soil, packing cases and growing medium
adult on the leaves, flowers and fruits
On plant material, T. palmi may potentially be found on most above-ground parts of the plant; the
parts of the plant infested can differ according to variables such as the host and the characteristics of
each separate T. palmi population.

During visual examination of plant material for the presence of T. palmi, attention must be paid to
silvery feeding scars on the leaf surfaces of host plants, especially alongside the midrib and the veins.
Heavily infested plants are often characterized by a silvered or bronzed appearance of the leaves,
stunted leaves and terminals, or scarred and deformed fruits. Detection may be hampered in
circumstances such as:
- low-level infestation, which may produce little or no detectable symptoms
- the presence of the eggs within the plant tissue only (for example after external treatment which
may have removed visible life stages).
Specimens for morphological examination are best collected in a fluid called AGA, which is a mixture
of 10 parts of 60% ethanol with 1 part of glycerine and 1 part of acetic acid. If the specimens are to be
stored, they should be transferred to 60% ethanol and kept in the dark, preferably in a freezer to
prevent loss of colour. However, several laboratories have reported that AGA may act to denature the
DNA of the thrips thereby hindering any subsequent molecular work. An alternative is to use 80–95%
ethanol as the collecting fluid as any unmounted specimens may then be used for molecular studies.
However, in this case specimens must be stored in the freezer until used, or they may prove difficult to
slide mount.
Several methods can be used to collect thrips specimens (Mantel and Vierbergen, 1996; modified):
- Thrips may be individually removed from the plant (leaves, flowers or fruit), and transferred
into microtubes containing AGA, using a moist, fine brush.
- Thrips may be beaten from plant parts onto a small plastic tray (e.g. a white tray for darkcoloured
specimens or a black tray for light-coloured specimens). In cooler conditions, the
thrips usually start walking across the tray rather than flying off, allowing time for the thrips to
be picked off with a moist fine brush, whereas in warmer conditions collection has to be done
more rapidly as the thrips are likely to fly off much more quickly. The thrips are easily seen on
the tray using just a hand lens, but an experienced observer can also see them easily with the
naked eye.
- Plant parts may be sealed in a plastic bag for 24 hours, with a piece of filter paper enclosed to
absorb condensation. Most thrips will leave the plant parts and can then be collected from the
inside of the bag.
- A Berlese funnel can be used to process plant material such as bulbs, flowers, turf, leaf litter,
moss and even dead branches of trees. The funnel contains a sieve on which the plant material is
deposited. Beneath the sieve, the bottom of the funnel leads into a receptacle containing 70–
96% ethanol. An alternative is to use 10% ethanol plus wetting agent as some workers find that
this makes the preparation of good quality microscope slide mounts easier. The funnel is placed
under an electric lamp (60 W), and the heat and light will drive most of the thrips present in the
plants down towards the receptacle. After an appropriate period (e.g. 8 hours for cut flowers),
the content of the receptacle can then be checked under a stereomicroscope.
- Thrips may be monitored (winged adults only) using coloured sticky traps or other appropriate
methods. The ability of a colour to attract thrips varies for different thrips species, but blue or
white traps are good for T. palmi, though yellow traps will also work. For microscope slide
preparation and identification, the thrips will have to be removed from the traps using glueremoving
fluids such as those based on citrus oils, dichloromethane or a turpentine substitute.
There are no recognized methods for extracting thrips pupae from the soil in a quarantine context.
4. Identification
Identification of thrips species by morphological examination is restricted to adult specimens because
there are no adequate keys for the identification of eggs, larvae or pupae. However, the presence of
larvae in samples can give important additional information such as confirming their development on
the host plants. The primary method of identification of adult material is from morphological   characters. In order to achieve species identification, these must be examined using a high-power
microscope (e.g. x400). Using this protocol with good-quality slide preparations should allow adult T.
palmi to be identified with certainty by morphological examination alone.
Molecular assays can be applied to all life stages including the immature stages for which
morphological identification to species is not possible. Additionally, in cases where adult specimens
are atypical or damaged, molecular assays may provide further relevant information about their
identity. However specificity of molecular assays is limited as they have been developed for specific
purposes and evaluated against a restricted number of species, using samples from different
geographic regions; therefore, such information needs to be carefully interpreted.
4.1 Morphological identification of the adult thrips
4.1.1 Preparation of thrips for microscopic examination
For high-power microscopic examination, adult thrips must be mounted on microscope slides.
Specimens to be kept in a reference collection are best macerated, dehydrated and mounted in Canada
balsam; Mound and Kibby (1998) provide a full description of this process. However, the full slide
preparation protocol for archival mounts takes 3 days to complete.
For routine identifications, a water-soluble mountant such as Hoyer’s medium (50 ml water, 30 g gum
arabic, 200 g chloral hydrate, 20 ml glycerine) is more rapid and relatively inexpensive. One popular
method of routine slide preparation is given by Mound and Kibby (1998) and described below
(different laboratories may find that other variants work equally well):
Transfer the specimens from the collecting fluid into clean 70% ethanol; if the specimens are
reasonably flexible, attempt to spread the legs, wings and antennae using micropins; transfer a single
thrips, ventral side uppermost, to a drop of Hoyer’s medium on a 13 mm diameter cover slip and use
micropins to rearrange the thrips if necessary; gently lower a microscope slide onto the mountant so
that the cover slip and mountant adhere to the middle of the slide; invert the slide as soon as the
mountant has spread to the edges of the cover slip; label the slide with details including locality, date
of collection and host plant; place the slide, cover slip up, into a drying oven at 35–40 °C and leave for
6 hours before attempting study; leave in the oven for approximately 3 weeks to dry the mountant,
before sealing the cover slip with resin or nail varnish.
4.1.2 Identification of the family Thripidae
Thrips palmi belongs to the family Thripidae, which includes more than 2000 species in 276 genera.
Species share the characteristics outlined in Table 1.
Table 1: Family Thripidae – shared characteristics
Body part Characteristic
Antennae seven or eight segments (occasionally six or nine)
segments III–IV have emergent sense cones (sensoria)
Forewings (if fully developed) usually slender, with two longitudinal veins each bearing a series of setae
Abdomen – female with a serrated ovipositor, which is turned downwards at the apex
Median sternites – male with or without glandular areas
4.1.3 Identification of the genus Thrips
The genus Thrips contains more than 280 species from all parts of the world, though the genus is
primarily from the Holarctic region and the Old World tropics. Members of the genus share the
characteristics outlined in Table 2.

Table 2: Genus Thrips – shared characteristics, adult specimens
Body part Characteristic
Body form (female) macropterous or micropterous
Antennae seven or eight segments
segments III–IV with forked emergent sense cones
Ocellar setae only two pairs present (pair I absent)
pair II shorter (at least no longer) than pair III
Pronotum two pairs (rarely one or none) of major posteroangular setae
usually three, sometimes four, pairs of posteromarginal setae
Prosternal basantra no setae present
Forewings the first vein with variably spaced setal row, second vein with complete setal
row
clavus with five veinal setae (rarely six)
Metascutum median pair of setae at or behind the anterior margin
striate or reticulate sculpturing
campaniform sensilla (metanotal pores) present or absent
Metasternal furca without a spinula
Fore tibia apical claw absent
Tarsi two-segmented
Abdominal tergites and
sternites
without posteromarginal craspeda (flanges)
Abdominal tergites tergites V–VIII with paired ctenidia laterally (combs – each comprising a
submarginal row of microtrichia) (occasionally also on IV)
tergite VIII: ctenidia posteromesad to the spiracles
Abdominal sternites and
pleurotergites
with or without discal (accessory) setae
Abdominal sternites (male) abdominal sterna III–VII, or less, each with a glandular area
(A simplified summary of the main characteristics is given in Table 4 and is accompanied by
illustrative line drawings and photomicrographs (Figures 4 to 5.12).)
Identification of the adults can be carried out with keys. Mound and Kibby (1998) provided a key to
14 Thrips species of economic importance including T. palmi. In addition, a CD-ROM identification
aid for thrips is available which includes an identification system to 100 pest species from around the
world based on photomicrographs (Moritz et al., 2004).
More comprehensive keys to the genus are available, produced on a regional basis (no such key has
been produced for the Afrotropical region):
Asia: Bhatti (1980) and Palmer (1992) provide keys for the identification of species of Thrips
occurring in the Asian tropics. Mound & Azidah (2009) provide a key to the species of
Peninsular Malaysia.
Europe: zur Strassen (2003) has produced the most recent comprehensive key to the species of Europe
including Thrips (in German).

North, Central and South America: Nakahara (1994) provides a key for Thrips species from the New
World. A key to the species of Thrips found in Central and South America is given by Mound
and Marullo (1996) though only one of these species is native to the region.
Oceania: Mound and Masumoto (2005) provide a key to the Thrips species of Oceania. (The authors
of the paper are aware of the error inadvertently introduced on p. 42 in the section
“Relationships” whereby a characteristic of T. flavus Schrank – ocellar setae III close together
behind the first ocellus – is attributed to T. palmi. The correct information is provided in the T.
palmi species description immediately above and is illustrated in Figure 72.)
4.1.4 Identification of Thrips palmi
4.1.4.1 Morphological characteristics of Thrips palmi
Bhatti (1980), Bournier (1983), Sakimura et al. (1986), zur Strassen (1989), Nakahara (1994) and
Mound and Masumoto (2005) all provide detailed descriptions of T. palmi. Sakimura et al. (1986)
gave a list of major diagnostic characters to distinguish T. palmi from the other known species of the
genus Thrips; a modified version is presented in Table 3.
Thrips palmi can be reliably separated from all other species of the genus Thrips by the possession of
all the characters listed in Table 3. Nevertheless, thrips morphology is subject to variation even within
a single species and some characters listed here may be subject to occasional slight variation. For
instance antennal coloration or the number of distal setae on the forewing can vary from the most
commonly observed states. If the specimen differs with respect to one or more of these character
states, then the identification should be checked by reference to an appropriate regional key such as
those listed in section 4.1.3.
Table 3: A list of morphological characteristics that collectively distinguish Thrips palmi from other species in the
genus Thrips
Morphological character
1. A clear yellow body with no dark areas on the head, thorax or abdomen (slightly thickened blackish
body setae); antennal segments I and II pale, III yellow with apex shaded, IV to VII brown but usually
with base of IV–V yellow; forewings uniformly slightly shaded, prominent setae dark
2. Antennae always seven-segmented
3. Postocular setae II and IV much smaller than remaining setae
4. Ocellar setae III standing either just outside of the ocellar triangle, or touching the tangent lines
connecting the anterior ocellus and each of the posterior ocelli
5. Metascutum with sculpture converging posteriorly; median pair of setae behind anterior margin; paired
campaniform sensilla present
6. Forewing first vein with three (occasionally two) distal setae
7. Abdominal tergite II with four lateral marginal setae
8. Abdominal tergites III to IV with setae S2 dark and subequal to S3
9. Abdominal tergite VIII with posteromarginal comb in female complete, in male broadly developed
posteriorly
10. Abdominal tergite IX usually with two pairs of campaniform sensilla (pores)
11. Abdominal sternites without discal setae or ciliate microtrichia
12. Abdominal pleurotergites without discal setae
13. Male: sternites III–VII each with a narrow transverse glandular area
A simplified summary of the main characteristics is given in Table 4 and is accompanied by
illustrative line drawings and photomicrographs (Figures 4 to 5.12).

4.1.4.2 Comparison with similar species (species that are yellow without darker body
markings, or predominantly yellow, or sometimes yellow)
For each species listed here, the main character differences by which they may be separated from
Thrips palmi are given. If in any doubt, refer to an appropriate regional key such as those listed in
section 4.1.3. These also give details of other Thrips species that are not listed below.
Two Indian species (T. alatus Bhatti and T. pallidulus Bagnall) are very similar to T. palmi, although
little is known about their biology.
Thrips alatus
- antennal segment V uniformly brown
- abdominal tergites III and IV with setae S2 paler and much weaker than S3 in both sexes
- the striate sculpture on the metascutum usually not converging posteriorly
- distribution: India, Malaysia, Nepal.
Thrips pallidulus
- antennal segment IV pale
- sculpture on the metascutum medially reticulate, not striate
- distribution: India.
Three common Palearctic species (but also with wider distributions) that may be confused with
T. palmi are T. flavus, T. nigropilosus Uzel and T. tabaci Lindeman.
Thrips flavus
- ocellar setae pair III inside the ocellar triangle, just behind the anterior ocellus
- length of antennal segment VI, 54–60 μm (42–48 μm in T. palmi)
- lines of sculpture on the metascutum not converging posteriorly
- distribution: common flower thrips throughout Asia, Europe.
Thrips nigropilosus
- usually with dark markings on the thorax and abdomen
- metascutum with irregular reticulations medially (longitudinal striae in T. palmi) and no
campaniform sensilla
- abdominal tergite II with three lateral marginal setae
- abdominal tergites IV–V with median pair of setae (S1) more than 0.5 times as long as the
median length of their tergites (less than 0.3 times in T. palmi)
- distribution: common leaf-feeding species, sometimes a pest of plants in the family Compositae;
Asia, East Africa, Europe, North America, Oceania.
Thrips tabaci
- highly variable in coloration, but usually with more or less brown or greyish markings
- all postocular setae subequal in length
- metascutum with irregular longitudinal reticulations, usually with small internal wrinkles
medially, and no campaniform sensilla
- forewing first vein usually with four (occasionally between two or six) distal setae
- abdominal tergite II with three lateral marginal setae
- abdominal tergite IX with posterior pair of campaniform sensilla only
- abdominal pleurotergites with numerous ciliate microtrichia arising from lines of sculpture
- male: narrow transverse glandular area on abdominal sternites III–V only
- distribution: polyphagous pest with a worldwide distribution.


Two further species, one Palearctic (T. alni Uzel) and one European (T. urticae Fabricius), are less
commonly encountered but may be confused with T. palmi. Females of T. alni are particularly similar
in morphology to those of T. palmi.
Thrips alni
- antennal segment V uniformly brown
- abdominal tergites II–V with setae S2 pale
- abdominal tergite V with seta S2 much weaker than seta S3 (these setae are subequal in
T. palmi)
- abdominal tergite VIII with seta S1 subequal to seta S2 (S1 is much weaker than S2 in T. palmi)
- male: abdominal sternites III–VI each with a small oval glandular area
- distribution: restricted to the leaves of Alnus, Betula, Salix; Europe, Siberia, Mongolia.
Thrips urticae
- pronotum with a pair of setae on the anterior margin almost twice as long as any of the discal
setae (usually more than 30 μm; not so in T. palmi, all less than 25 μm)
- metascutum with longitudinal reticulations medially
- abdominal tergites usually with a grey area medially
- abdominal tergite IX with posterior pair of campaniform sensilla only
- distribution: restricted to Urtica dioica; Europe.
Table 4: Simplified checklists of the diagnostic features for quick recognition: (a) the genus Thrips; (b) Thrips
palmi (See Figure 4 for the location of the various features.)
(a) Specimens can be recognized as Thrips by the following combination of characters
Antenna with seven or eight distinct segments; segments III and IV with
forked sense cones
Figs 5.1,
5.2
Head with two pairs of ocellar setae (II and III); pair I missing, pair II
shorter than pair III
Fig. 5.3
Forewing 1st vein – setal row on the first vein continuous or interrupted Fig. 5.5
Abdominal tergites V to VIII with paired ctenidia Fig. 5.6
Abdominal tergite VIII with ctenidia posteromesad to the spiracles Fig. 5.6
(b) Specimens can be identified as Thrips palmi by the presence of the following characters
Body colour clear yellow body with no dark areas on the head, thorax or
abdomen; antennal segments I and II are pale
Figs 1–3
Antennal segment V usually yellowish in basal ⅓ to ½ Fig. 5.1
Antennal segment VI length = 42–48 μm Fig. 5.1
Head: ocellar setae pair III with their bases sited outside of the ocellar triangle or touching
the tangent lines connecting the anterior ocellus to each of the
posterior ocelli
Fig. 5.3
Pronotum with two pairs of major posteroangular setae Fig. 5.4
Forewing: 1st vein with three (occasionally two) distal setae Fig. 5.5
Metascutum with median pair of setae behind the anterior margin and a pair of
campaniform sensilla; with striate sculpture converging
posteriorly
Fig. 5.7
Abdominal pleurotergites discal setae absent; lines of sculpture without ciliate microtrichia Fig. 5.8
Abdominal tergite II with four lateral marginal setae Fig. 5.9
Abdominal tergites III and IV S2 almost equal to S3 Fig. 5.10


Table 4 continued
Abdominal tergite VIII female with complete posteromarginal comb; male with
posteromarginal comb broadly developed medially
Fig. 5.6
Abdominal tergite IX with anterior and posterior pairs of campaniform sensilla (pores) Fig. 5.11
Male: sternites transverse glandular areas on sternites III to VII Fig. 5.12


4.2 Molecular assays for identifying Thrips palmi
Four molecular assays have been published that can be used to support a morphological identification
of T. palmi and these are described below. The specificity of each assay is also described. This
indicates the thrips species against which each assay was evaluated and the original use for which the
assay was designed. A CD-ROM identification system is also available that includes molecular data
for thrips species (Moritz et al., 2004). Considering the specific limitations of molecular methods a
negative molecular test result does not exclude the possibility of positive identification by
morphological methods.
In this diagnostic protocol, methods (including reference to brand names) are described as published,
as these define the original level of sensitivity, specificity and/or reproducibility achieved.
Requirements for controls
With all molecular methods the use of appropriate controls is essential; a validated T. palmi-positive
extract must be included as an additional sample to ensure that amplification has been successful. PCR
amplification, either for real-time PCR or PCR-RFLP, must also be performed on a sample with no
DNA. This negative control indicates possible reagent contamination and false positives.
DNA extraction
DNA may be extracted from single eggs, adults, pupae or larvae. For each of the assays described
below refer to the source paper for the original specific DNA extraction technique used. Laboratories
may find that alternative extraction techniques work equally well; DNA may be extracted using any
DNA extraction methods suitable for insects. For example:
- The thrips may be ground in a lysis buffer in a microtube using a micropestle, and the
homogenate taken through a proteinase-K-based DNA extraction kit according to the
appropriate manufacturer’s instructions.
- Alternatively, a thrips may be ground in 50 μl nuclease-free water before the addition of 50 μl
of a 1:1 (volume to volume) slurry of Chelex 100 resin, and nuclease-free water, heated to 95 ºC
for 5 min and centrifuged at 11,000 g for 5 min. The supernatant is transferred to a new
microtube and stored at −20 ºC.
Several recent papers have described non-destructive techniques for extracting DNA from thrips,
which have the advantage that after DNA extraction has been completed a cleared specimen remains
available for slide mounting (e.g., Rugman-Jones et al., 2006; Mound and Morris, 2007).
4.2.1 SCAR marker-generated sequence-based real-time PCR assay for Thrips palmi
This assay of Walsh et al. (2005) was designed as a species-specific assay against T. palmi for use by
the phytosanitary authorities in England and Wales. It was evaluated by screening it against 21 other
species of Thysanoptera, including ten belonging to the genus Thrips (T. flavus, T. major Uzel, T.
minutissimus L., T. nigropilosus, T. sambuci Heeger, T. tabaci, T. trehernei Priesner or T. physapus L.,
T. urticae, T. validus Uzel, T. vulgatissimus Haliday). These were predominantly, but not exclusively,
European species.
Methodology
The T. palmi-specific PCR primers and TaqMan probe used in this assay were as follows:
PCR primer: P4E8-362F (5′-CCGACAAAATCGGTCTCATGA-3′)
PCR primer: P4E8-439R (5′-GAAAAGTCTCAGGTACAACCCAGTTC-3′)
TaqMan probe: P4E8-385T (FAM 5′-AGACGGATTGACTTAGACGGGAACGGTT-3′ TAMRA).


Real-time PCR reactions were set up using the TaqMan PCR core reagent kit (Applied Biosystems)1,
with 1 μl (10–20 ng) of DNA extract, 7.5 pmol of each primer and 2.5 pmol probe in a total volume of
25 μl. Plates were cycled at generic system conditions (10 min at 95 °C and 40 cycles of 1 min at
60 °C, 15 s at 95 °C) on either of the ABI Prism 7700 or ABI 7900HT Sequence Detection Systems
(Applied Biosystems)2, using real-time data collection. Ct values lower than 40 indicated the presence
of T. palmi DNA.
4.2.2 COI sequence-based real-time PCR assay for Thrips palmi
This assay of Kox et al. (2005) was designed as a species-specific assay against T. palmi for use by the
phytosanitary authorities in the Netherlands. It was evaluated by screening the assay against 23 other
species of thrips, including 11 belonging to the genus Thrips (T. alliorum (Priesner), T. alni, T.
angusticeps Uzel, T. fuscipennis Haliday, T. latiareus Vierbergen, T. major, T. minutissimus, T.
parvispinus (Karny), T. tabaci, T. urticae, T. vulgatissimus). These were predominantly, but not
exclusively, European species.
Methodology
The Thrips palmi-specific PCR primers and TaqMan probe used in this assay are as follows:
PCR primer: Tpalmi 139F* (5′-TCA TGC TGG AAT TTC AGT AGA TTT AAC-3′)
PCR primer: Tpalmi 286R* (5′-TCA CAC RAA TAA TCT TAG TTT TTC TCT TG-3′)
TaqMan probe: TpP (6-FAM 5′-TAG CTG GGG TAT CCT CAA-3′ MGB).
* Primers have been adjusted for greater sensitivity since original publication.
(COI sequences that mismatch with the TaqMan probe in this assay have been deposited on GenBank
from a number of specimens from India identified as T. palmi on the basis of their morphology
(Asokan et al., 2007). These sequences would not produce a positive result using this assay. The
taxonomic or phylogenetic significance of this sequence differentiation currently remains unclear.)
The 25 μl reaction mixture contained 12.5 μl of 2x TaqMan Universal Master Mix (Applied
Biosystems)3, 0.9 μM each primer, 0.1 μM TaqMan probe, 1.0 μl DNA. The real-time PCR was
performed on either of the ABI Prism 7700 or ABI 7900HT Sequence Detection Systems (Applied
Biosystems)4 using the following conditions: 10 min at 95 °C; then 40 cycles of 1 min at 60 °C and 15
s at 94 °C. Ct values lower than 40 indicated the presence of T. palmi DNA.
4.2.3 ITS2 sequence-based PCR-RFLP assay for nine species of thrips including Thrips
palmi
This assay (Toda and Komazaki, 2002) was designed to separate nine species of thrips, including T.
palmi, that are found in fruit trees in Japan: Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande), F. intonsa
(Trybom), T. hawaiiensis Morgan, T. coloratus Schmutz, T. flavus, T. tabaci, T. palmi, T. setosus
Moulton, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood.
1, 2 The use of the brand Applied Biosystems for the TaqMan PCR core reagent kit and the ABI Prism 7700 or
ABI 7900HT Sequence Detection Systems in this diagnostic protocol implies no approval of them to the
exclusion of others that may also be suitable. This information is given for the convenience of users of this
protocol and does not constitute an endorsement by the CPM of the chemical, reagent and/or equipment named.
Equivalent products may be used if they can be shown to lead to the same results.
3, 4 The use the brand Applied Biosystems for the TaqMan Universal Master Mix and ABI Prism 7700 or ABI
7900HT Sequence Detection Systems in this diagnostic protocol implies no approval of them to the exclusion of
others that may also be suitable. This information is given for the convenience of users of this protocol and does
not constitute and endorsement by the CPM of the chemical, reagent   and/or equipment named. Equivalent
products may be used if they can be shown to lead to the same results.


Methodology
The PCR primers (located in the 5.8 S and 28 S regions flanking the ITS2 region of ribosomal DNA)
used in this assay were as follows:
5′-TGTGAACTGCAGGACACATGA-3′
5′-GGTAATCTCACCTGAACTGAGGTC-3′.
T. palmi generated a 588-base-pair (bp) PCR product (longer or shorter fragments were produced from
the other species). The 20 μl reaction mixture was composed as follows: 1 μM each primer, 250 μM
dNTPs, 1 Unit of AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems)5, 2 μl 10x reaction buffer
[with 25 mM MgCl2], 0.5 μl DNA. The PCR was performed in a 9600 DNA thermocycler (Applied
Biosytems)6, with the following conditions: 9 min at 95 °C, 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 30 s at 50 °C,
and 1 min at 72 °C, followed by a final extension for 7 min at 72 °C and quickly cooled to room
temperature. The PCR products were analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis.
5 μl of PCR product (without purification) was digested with the enzyme RsaI according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. Digested PCR products were separated by 2.0% agarose gel
electrophoresis.
Restriction fragment sizes produced by T. palmi when the ITS2 fragment is digested with RsaI were as
follows: 371, 98, 61 and 58 bp.
4.2.4 COI sequence-based PCR-RFLP assay for ten species of thrips including Thrips
palmi
This assay of Brunner et al. (2002) was designed to separate ten species of thrips, including T. palmi,
which are mostly, but not exclusively, pest species found in Europe: Anaphothrips obscurus (Müller),
Echinothrips americanus Morgan, Frankliniella occidentalis, Heliothrips haemorrhoidalis (Bouché),
Hercinothrips femoralis (Reuter), Parthenothrips dracaenae (Heeger), Taeniothrips picipes
(Zetterstedt), Thrips angusticeps Uzel, T. palmi, T. tabaci.
Methodology
The PCR primers (located in the mitochondrial COI gene sequence) used in this assay are as follows:
mtD-7.2F (5′-ATTAGGAGCHCCHGAYATAGCATT-3′)
mtD9.2R (5′-CAGGCAAGATTAAAATATAAACTTCTG-3′).
These primers amplified a 433-bp fragment in all the species separated by this assay. The 50 μl
reaction mixture was composed as follows: 0.76 μM each primer, 200 μM dNTPs, 1 Unit Taq DNA
polymerase, 5 μl 10X reaction buffer [with 15 mM MgCl2], 1 μl DNA. The PCR was performed in a
standard thermocycler with the following conditions: 1 min 94 °C, 40 cycles of 15 s at 94 °C, 30 s at
55 °C, and 45 s at 72 °C, followed by a final extension for 10 min at 72 °C and quickly cooled to room
temperature. To gauge the fragment size produced after amplification, 5 μl of the PCR products were
analysed by 1.0–2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis.
5 μl of PCR product (without purification) was digested with the enzymes AluI and Sau3AI in separate
reactions according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Digested PCR products were separated by
agarose gel electrophoresis.
5, 6 The use of the brand Applied Biosystems AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase and 9600 DNA thermocycler in
this diagnostic protocol implies no approval of them to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. This
information is given for the convenience of users of this protocol and does not constitute and endorsement by the
CPM of the chemical, reagent and/or equipment named. Equivalent products may be used if they can be shown
to lead to the same results.

Restriction fragment sizes produced by T. palmi when the COI fragment is digested with AluI and
Sau3AI are as follows:
AluI: 291 and 194 bp
Sau3AI: 293, 104, 70 and 18 bp.
5. Records
Records and evidence should be retained as described in section 2.5 of ISPM 27:2006.
In cases where other contracting parties may be adversely affected by the diagnosis, the records and
evidence (in particular, preserved or slide-mounted specimens, photographs of distinctive taxonomic
structures, DNA extracts and photographs of gels, as appropriate), should be kept for at least one year.
6. Contact points for further information
Entomology Section, National Reference Laboratory, Plant Protection Service, P.O. Box 9102, 6700
HC Wageningen, Netherlands. Telephone: +31 317 496824; e-mail: g.vierbergen@minlnv.nl;
fax: +31 317 423977.
Pest and Disease Identification Team, The Food and Environment Research Agency, Sand Hutton,
York YO41 1LZ, United Kingdom. Telephone: +44 1904 462215; e-mail:
dom.collins@fera.gsi.gov.uk; fax: +44 1904 462111.
Area Entomología, Departamento Laboratorios Biológicos, Dirección General de Servicios Agrícolas,
MGAP, Av. Millán 4703, C. P. 12900, Montevideo, Uruguay. Telephone: +598 2304 3992; email:
ifrioni@mgap.gub.uy; fax: +598 2304 3992.
7. Acknowledgements
The first draft of this protocol was written by D.W. Collins, Pest and Disease Identification
Programme, The Food and Environment Research Agency, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, United
Kingdom; G. Vierbergen, Dr. L.F.F. Kox, Plant Protection Service, Section of Entomology,
Wageningen, Netherlands; and Ing. Agr. N.C. Vaccaro, Sección Entomología, INTA-EEA Concordia,
Argentina. Line drawings for Figure 5 were produced by S. Kobro, Norwegian Crop Protection
Institute, Norway.
8. References
Asokan, R., Krishna Kumar, N.K., Kumar, V. & Ranganath, H.R. 2007. Molecular differences in
the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (mtCOI) gene and development of a species-specific
marker for onion thrips, Thrips tabaci Lindeman, and melon thrips, T. palmi Karny
(Thysanoptera: Thripidae), vectors of tospoviruses (Bunyaviridae). Bulletin of Entomological
Research, 97: 461–470.
Bhatti, J.S. 1980. Species of the genus Thrips from India (Thysanoptera). Systematic Entomology, 5:
109–166.
Bournier, J.P. 1983. Un insecte polyphage: Thrips palmi (Karny), important ravageur du cotonnier
aux Philippines. Cotonnier et Fibres Tropicales, 38: 286–288.
Brunner, P.C., Fleming, C. & Frey, J.E. 2002. A molecular identification key for economically
important thrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) using direct sequencing and a PCR-RFLPbased
approach. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 4: 127–136.
EPPO. 2008. URL: http://www.eppo.org/. Accessed 17 June 2008.
EPPO/CABI. 1997. Thrips palmi. In I.M. Smith, D.G. McNamara, P.R. Scott & M. Holderness, eds.
Quarantine pests for Europe, 2nd edition. Wallingford, UK, CAB International. 1425 pp.

Kox, L.F.F., van den Beld, H.E., Zijlstra, C. & Vierbergen, G. 2005. Real-time PCR assay for the
identification of Thrips palmi. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 35: 141–148.
Mantel, W.P. & Vierbergen, G. 1996. Additional species to the Dutch list of Thysanoptera and new
intercepted Thysanoptera on imported plant material. Folia Entomologica Hungarica, 57
(Suppl.): 91–96.
Moritz, G., Mound, L.A., Morris, D.C. & Goldarazena, A. 2004. Pest thrips of the world: visual
and molecular identification of pest thrips (CD-ROM), Centre for Biological Information
Technology (CBIT), University of Brisbane. ISBN 1-86499-781-8.
Mound, L.A. & Azidah, A.A. 2009. Species of the genus Thrips (Thysanoptera) from Peninsular
Malaysia, with a checklist of recorded Thripidae. Zootaxa, 2023: 55–68.
Mound, L.A. & Kibby, G. 1998. Thysanoptera. An Identification Guide. 2nd edition. Wallingford,
UK, CAB International. 70 pp.
Mound, L.A. & Marullo, R. 1996. The thrips of Central and South America: an introduction (Insecta:
Thysanoptera). Memoirs on Entomology, International, 6: 1–488.
Mound, L.A. & Masumoto, M. 2005. The genus Thrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae) in Australia, New
Caledonia and New Zealand. Zootaxa, 1020: 1–64.
Mound, L.A. & Morris, D.C. 2007. A new thrips pest of Myoporum cultivars in California, in a new
genus of leaf-galling Australian Phlaeothripidae (Thysanoptera). Zootaxa, 1495: 3545.
Murai, T. 2002. The pest and vector from the East: Thrips palmi. In R. Marullo, & L.A. Mound, eds.
Thrips and Tospoviruses: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Thysanoptera.
Italy, 2–7 July 2001, pp. 19–32. Canberra, Australian National Insect Collection.
Nakahara, S. 1994. The genus Thrips Linnaeus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) of the New World. USDA
Technical Bulletin No. 1822. 183 pp.
PaDIL. 2007. Pests and Diseases Image Library. URL: http://www.padil.gov.au. Accessed 18 Oct
2007.
Palmer, J.M. 1992. Thrips (Thysanoptera) from Pakistan to the Pacific: a review. Bulletin of the
British Museum (Natural History). Entomology Series, 61: 1–76.
Rugman-Jones, P.F., Hoddle, M.S., Mound, L.A. & Stouthamer, R. 2006. Molecular identification
key for pest species of Scirtothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Journal of Economic
Entomology, 99 (5): 1813–1819.
Sakimura, K., Nakahara, L.M. & Denmark, H.A. 1986. A thrips, Thrips palmi Karny
(Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Entomology Circular No. 280. Division of Plant Industry, Florida;
Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services. 4 pp.
Toda, S. & Komazaki, S. 2002. Identification of thrips species (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on
Japanese fruit trees by polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism
of the ribosomal ITS2 region. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 92: 359–363.
Walsh, K., Boonham, N., Barker, I. & Collins, D.W. 2005. Development of a sequence-specific
real-time PCR to the melon thrips Thrips palmi (Thysan., Thripidae). Journal of Applied
Entomology, 129 (5): 272–279.
zur Strassen, R. 1989. Was ist Thrips palmi? Ein neuer Quarantäne-Schädling in Europa. Gesunde
Pflanzen, 41: 63–67.
zur Strassen, R. 2003. Die terebranten Thysanopteren Europas und des Mittelmeer-Gebietes. In Die
Tierwelt Deutschlands. Begründet 1925 von Friedrich Dahl, 74: 5–277. Keltern, Goecke &
Evers.



Publication history
2006-04 CPM-1 added topic diagnostic protocol for Thrips palmi (2006-038)
2006-10 TPDP developed draft text
2007-05 SC approved draft text for MC
2007-06 Sent for MC under fast-track process
2007-10 SC-7 revised draft text
2007-11 SC requested TPDP to review
2008-11 SC noted draft text under TPDP review
2009-05 SC recalled draft text to TPDP
2009-11 SC approved revised draft for MC
2009-12 Sent for MC under fast-track process
2009-12 SC revised draft text for adoption via e-decision
2010-03 CPM-5 adopted Annex 1 to ISPM 27
ISPM 27. 2006: Annex 1 Thrips palmi Karny (2010)
Publication history: Last modified August 2011







ISPM 36

         


                 INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR PHYTOSANITARY MEASURES   

                                                                     ISPM 36
 


                        INTEGRATED MEASURES FOR PLANTS FOR PLANTING
 


                                                                    (2012)


 Produced by the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention



 © FAO 2012                                                                      



Publication history
This is not an official part of the standard
2005 ICPM-7 added topic Plants for planting (including movement, post-entry
quarantine and certification programmes) (2005-002).
2006-05 SC approved specification 34
2006-09 EWG drafted ISPM
2007-02 EWG revised draft ISPM
2008-05 SC-7 revised draft ISPM via e-mail consultation based on SC-7
recommendation
2008-12 EWG revised draft ISPM
2010-04 SC approved draft ISPM to go for MC
2010-06 member consultation
2011-05 SC-7 revised draft ISPM
2011-11 SC revised in meeting
2012-03 CPM-7 adopted standard
ISPM 36. 2012. Integrated measures for plants for planting. Rome, IPPC, FAO.    



Contents
Adoption ............................................................................................................................................. 36-5
INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 36-5
Scope .................................................................................................................................................. 36-5
References .......................................................................................................................................... 36-5
Definitions .......................................................................................................................................... 36-5
Outline of Requirements .................................................................................................................... 36-5
BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 36-6
REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................................. 36-6
1. Basis for Regulation .................................................................................................................... 36-6
2. Integrated Measures .................................................................................................................... 36-7
2.1 General integrated measures ....................................................................................... 36-7
2.1.1 Approval of places of production ................................................................................ 36-7
2.1.2 Requirements for the place of production ................................................................... 36-7
2.2 Additional integrated measures in higher pest risk situations ..................................... 36-8
2.2.1 Requirements for the place of production in higher pest risk situations ..................... 36-8
2.2.1.1 Place of production manual ......................................................................................... 36-8
2.2.1.2 Pest management programme ..................................................................................... 36-9
2.2.1.3 Plant protection specialist .......................................................................................... 36-10
2.2.1.4 Training of personnel ................................................................................................ 36-10
2.2.1.5 Examination of plant material ................................................................................... 36-10
2.2.1.6 Packaging and transportation .................................................................................... 36-10
2.2.1.7 Internal audits ............................................................................................................ 36-10
2.2.1.8 Records ...................................................................................................................... 36-11
2.3 Non-conformity with requirements for the place of production ............................... 36-11
3. Responsibilities of the NPPO of the Exporting Country .......................................................... 36-12
3.1 Setting up integrated measures .................................................................................. 36-12
3.2 Approval of places of production .............................................................................. 36-12
3.3 Oversight of approved places of production ............................................................. 36-13
3.4 Export inspections and issuance of phytosanitary certificates .................................. 36-13
3.5 Providing information ............................................................................................... 36-13
4. Responsibilities of the NPPO of the Importing Country .......................................................... 36-13
4.1 Auditing ..................................................................................................................... 36-14
ANNEX 1: Factors that affect the pest risk of plants for planting ................................................... 36-15
APPENDIX 1: Examples of pest management measures to reduce the pest risk of plants for planting at a place of production .............................................................................................. 36-17
APPENDIX 2: Examples of non-conformity ................................................................................... 36-20




      Adoption
This standard was adopted by the Seventh Session of the Commission on Phytosanitary Measures in March 2012.
INTRODUCTION
Scope
This standard outlines the main criteria for the identification and application of integrated measures at the place of production for the production of plants for planting (excluding seeds) for international trade. It provides guidance to help identify and manage pest risks associated with plants for planting as a pathway.
References
ISPM 2. 2007. Framework for pest risk analysis. Rome, IPPC, FAO.
ISPM 5. Glossary of phytosanitary terms. Rome, IPPC, FAO.
ISPM 11. 2004. Pest risk analysis for quarantine pests including analysis of environmental risks and living modified organisms. Rome, IPPC, FAO.
ISPM 12. 2011. Phytosanitary certificates. Rome, IPPC, FAO.
ISPM 13. 2001. Guidelines for the notification of non-compliance and emergency action. Rome, IPPC, FAO.
ISPM 17. 2002. Pest reporting. Rome, IPPC, FAO.
ISPM 20. 2004. Guidelines for a phytosanitary import regulatory system. Rome, IPPC, FAO.
ISPM 21. 2004. Pest risk analysis for regulated non-quarantine pests. Rome, IPPC, FAO.
ISPM 24. 2005. Guidelines for the determination and recognition of equivalence of phytosanitary measures. Rome, IPPC, FAO.
ISPM 32. 2009. Categorization of commodities according to their pest risk. Rome, IPPC, FAO.
Definitions
Definitions of phytosanitary terms used in the present standard can be found in ISPM 5 (Glossary of phytosanitary terms).
Outline of Requirements
Plants for planting are generally considered to pose a higher pest risk than other regulated articles. Integrated measures may be used to manage the pest risks that plants for planting pose as a pathway for regulated pests and to ensure they meet phytosanitary import requirements. The use of integrated measures involves national plant protection organizations (NPPOs) as well as producers1, and relies on pest risk management measures applied throughout the production and distribution processes.
Integrated measures may be developed and implemented by the NPPO of the exporting country. General integrated measures may include requirements such as keeping a plan of the place of production, examination of plants, keeping records, treating pests and sanitation. Where justified, additional elements such as a place of production manual including a pest management programme, appropriate training for personnel, specific packing and transportation requirements, and internal and external audits may be required.
1 Producer hereinafter refers to a producer of plants for planting at the place of production.



 The NPPO of the exporting country should approve and oversee places of production using integrated measures, as well as issue phytosanitary certificates that attest to the consignment as meeting the phytosanitary requirements of the importing country.
BACKGROUND
Several ISPMs provide general guidance on pest risk management (e.g. ISPM 2:2007, ISPM 11:2004, ISPM 21:2004, ISPM 32:2009). The conclusions from pest risk analyses (PRAs) should be used to decide the phytosanitary measures to reduce the pest risk to an acceptable level for the importing country.
Plants for planting are generally considered to pose a higher pest risk than other regulated articles and therefore additional specific guidance on pest risk management is needed to help address this higher pest risk.
Integrated measures may be used at places of production to manage the risk of regulated pests, especially those that are difficult to detect during import or export inspections because:
- some pests do not cause distinct visual symptoms, particularly at low pest incidence
- symptoms of infestation may be latent or masked at the time of inspection (e.g. as a result of pesticide use, nutrient imbalances, dormancy of plants at time of dispatch, presence of other non-regulated pests or by removal of symptomatic leaves)
- small insects or eggs may be hidden under bark or scales of buds etc.
- the type of packaging, size and physical state of the consignment can influence the effectiveness of inspection
- detection methods for many pests, particularly pathogens, may not be available.
The application of integrated measures for pest risk management requires not only the participation of the NPPO of the exporting country but also the participation of producers throughout all the stages of production of the plants for planting.
Integrated measures are designed to manage the risks related to regulated pests, and also have the advantage of managing other pests at the place of production.
It is expected that this standard will contribute to the protection of biodiversity and the environment by setting up guidelines for the use of integrated measures that will contribute to minimizing the international spread of pests.
REQUIREMENTS
1. Basis for Regulation
The importing country may establish and shall communicate its technically justified phytosanitary import requirements for plants for planting (refer to ISPM 2:2007, ISPM 11:2004 and ISPM 21:2004). Annex 1 outlines factors to be taken into account when the NPPO of the importing country conducts a PRA for plants for planting.
The NPPO of the exporting country should develop and set up measures that meet the phytosanitary import requirements. Integrated measures may be developed and set up in two different cases as follows:
- The importing country, in its phytosanitary import requirements, specifies integrated measures to be used in the exporting country.
- The importing country does not explicitly require integrated measures to be used, but the NPPO of the exporting country deems that using integrated measures would be a suitable and effective means of achieving the importing country’s phytosanitary import requirements and, therefore, decides to specify integrated measures to be applied by producers wishing to export plants for planting to that particular importing country.
If in the latter case the NPPO of the exporting country deems that the “integrated measures” that it has put in place are equivalent to the phytosanitary import requirements of an importing country, the exporting country should seek formal approval of equivalence of these measures with the importing country (ISPM 24:2005).
A producer wishing to participate in using integrated measures, in order to qualify to export plants for planting to particular countries, should seek approval from its NPPO. Subsequently, the NPPO of the exporting country may approve producers conforming to requirements for integrated measures set up by that NPPO.
2. Integrated Measures
This standard describes two main levels of integrated measures. Section 2.1 (General integrated measures) describes a set of integrated measures that may be widely applicable to all plants for planting. Section 2.2 (Additional integrated measures in higher pest risk situations) describes additional elements designed to manage pest risks in higher pest risk situations. It may not be necessary to require all these elements. Furthermore, for certain production systems not all elements may be applicable (e.g. physical barriers for field-grown plants). Therefore, only some of the elements described in section 2.2 may be appropriate. NPPOs may consider these options in addition to pre-export or port of entry inspections in order to manage pest risks.
2.1 General integrated measures
The NPPO of the exporting country may approve a place of production that complies with requirements on general integrated measures described hereafter.
2.1.1 Approval of places of production
The following conditions should be included in the approval process for producers seeking to use the general integrated measures:
- maintaining an updated plan of the place of production as well as keeping records of when, where and how plants for planting were produced, treated, stored or prepared for movement from the place of production (including information on all plant species at the place of production and the type of plant material such as cuttings, in vitro cultures, bare root plants)
- keeping records for a period determined by the NPPO of the exporting country that verify where and how plants for planting were purchased, stored, produced, distributed and any other relevant information on their plant health status
- access to a plant protection specialist with a well-established working knowledge of pest identification and control
- designating a contact person for communication with the NPPO of the exporting country.
2.1.2 Requirements for the place of production
The following requirements may be adequate for approval of places of production to use general integrated measures:
- conducting examinations of plants and places of production by designated personnel as necessary, at appropriate times and according to information and protocols provided by the NPPO of the exporting country
- keeping records of all examinations, including a description of pests found and corrective actions taken
- taking specific measures where necessary (e.g. to keep the plants free from pests regulated in the country of import) and documenting these measures  - notifying the NPPO of the exporting country if any pests regulated in the country of import are observed
- establishing and documenting a system of sanitation and hygiene.
Table 1 in Appendix 1 provides specific examples of pest management measures related to pest group characteristics that are applicable for most types of plants for planting at places of production.
Table 2 in Appendix 1 provides examples of possible pest management measures that NPPOs may require for different types of plants for planting and different types or groups of pests associated with them. The examples describe frequently used measures for important pest types of the relevant type of plants for planting.
2.2 Additional integrated measures in higher pest risk situations
Where general integrated measures alone are not sufficient to manage the pest risk, the NPPO of the exporting country may approve a place of production that complies with the requirements for additional integrated measures in higher pest risk situations.
2.2.1 Requirements for the place of production in higher pest risk situations
The NPPO of the exporting country should require that producers applying for approval to use additional integrated measures for higher pest risk situations develop a place of production manual describing the pest management programme and including relevant information on production practices and operational systems. The NPPO of the exporting country may approve the place of production to export specific plants to a particular destination when it has determined the integrated measures used meet the phytosanitary import requirements of that country.
The following sections provide the elements to be documented and implemented by the producer and audited by the NPPO of the exporting country.
2.2.1.1 Place of production manual
The place of production manual should describe all of the requirements, elements, processes and operational systems that make up the integrated measures for pest risk management of the plants for planting. The manual should be developed, implemented and maintained by the producer and approved by the NPPO of the exporting country2. The manual or parts thereof should be specific to particular plant species or destinations. If the manual is amended, it should be resubmitted for approval by the NPPO of the exporting country.
The place of production manual may include the following elements:
- a description of the organizational structure and of the responsibilities of the relevant personnel, including names of the person designated as responsible for the technical performance of the place of production and the plant protection specialist (see section 2.2.1.3) (either of these personnel may serve as the contact point between the NPPO and the producer, and should notify the NPPO of the exporting country upon detection of pests regulated in the country of import)
- a plan and description of the place of production, which is kept up to date and which records when, where and how the various species and types of plants for planting are produced, treated, stored or prepared for movement from the place of production (including information on plant species, source of plant material and type of plant material such as cuttings, in vitro cultures, bare root plants)
- a pest management programme (see section 2.2.1.2)
- a description of dispatch and receiving locations within the place of production
2 A documented quality management system, where available, may also be presented to the NPPO for consideration.


- handling procedures for incoming plant material, including procedures to ensure segregation of incoming plant material from material already on site
- a description of subcontracted activities and the process for approval
- a description of documentation procedures to maintain evidence of the source and origin of propagation material
- a description of how internal audits will be conducted, including the frequency and the responsible personnel
- procedures to notify the NPPO of the exporting country if a pest regulated in the country of import is detected
- procedures for recall of plants when non-conformity is detected, if appropriate
- procedures for visitors.
2.2.1.2 Pest management programme
The pest management programme, included in the place of production manual, should describe procedures or processes approved by the NPPO of the exporting country and designed to either prevent infestations or control pests. It should include a description of the phytosanitary import requirements of the importing countries for each plant species and type of plant material. Table 2 in Appendix 1 provides examples of possible measures that NPPOs may require for different types of plants for planting and different types or groups of pests associated with them.
The pest management programme should include the following elements:
- sanitation and hygiene – contributing to preventing the introduction of pests to the place of production and minimizing spread within a place of production, for example:
 regular removal of infested plants and plant debris
 disinfection of tools and equipment
 removal of weeds and non-crop plant material
 treatment of water
 management of surface water
 personal hygiene (e.g. hand washing, foot baths, coveralls or aprons)
 limited access
 routines for use of packaging material and packaging facilities
- pest control – products, procedures and measures (see Appendix 1) to prevent or treat pests such as:
 physical barriers (e.g. screens, double doors)
 disinfection of growing media and containers used to grow plants
 crop protection product applications (e.g. chemical, biological)
 disposal of infested plants
 mass trapping of both pests of concern and possible vectors
 climate control
 hot water or heat treatment
 any other treatment proven to control the pest of concern
- handling of incoming plant material – methods and documentation for managing pest risks associated with incoming plant material, with descriptions of:
 measures to ensure that all plants for planting entering the place of production are free of pests regulated by the importing countries, possible pest vectors and practically free of other pests
 procedures to be followed if pests or possible vectors are detected   records to be kept, including the date, the name of the person carrying out the examination, any pests (including possible vectors), damage or symptoms found, and any corrective actions taken
- examination of plant material (see section 2.2.1.5) and production sites – methods, frequency and intensity used to examine all plant material in the place of production (e.g. by visual examination, sampling, testing and trapping), including details of any laboratories used to identify pests found and methods used
- examination of plants for planting prior to export – methods, frequency and intensity used to examine plants when exports are being prepared
- identification and management of infested plants, with descriptions of:
 how an infested plant will be identified and treated
 measures to ensure that plants that do not meet importing countries’ phytosanitary import requirements are not exported
 disposal of removed plant material in a manner that prevents buildup and spread of pests
- keeping records of the application of crop protection products and other pest management measures.
2.2.1.3 Plant protection specialist
The NPPO of the exporting country should require producers, implementing additional integrated measures in higher pest risk situations, to use a specialist with a well-established working knowledge of pest identification and control in order to ensure that sanitation, pest monitoring and pest control measures are implemented as described in the place of production manual. The plant protection specialist may serve as the contact person with diagnosticians who may be needed for pest identification.
2.2.1.4 Training of personnel
Personnel should be trained to detect pests, especially those regulated by the importing country, and to follow a formal reporting system to communicate information on pest findings. Training should also include methods to handle material to reduce pest risk.
2.2.1.5 Examination of plant material
All plant material produced in a place of production (including plants destined for domestic markets and other production sites) should be examined for the presence of pests on a regular schedule by designated personnel according to established methods and corrective action applied as necessary.
2.2.1.6 Packaging and transportation
The following considerations apply to packaging and transport operations:
- Plant material should be packed in a manner to prevent infestation by regulated pests.
- Packaging material should be clean, free of pests and meet the phytosanitary import requirements.
- Conveyances used to move plant material from the place of production should be examined and cleaned as necessary prior to loading.
- Each lot in a consignment should be identified in a way that can be traced back to the place of production.
2.2.1.7 Internal audits
Internal audits should be conducted to ensure that the producer is in compliance with its manual. Internal audits should focus on whether the manual and its implementation meet the requirements of the NPPOs of the exporting and importing countries. For example, the internal audit may evaluate the  competency of personnel in identifying and controlling pests, carrying out duties and responsibilities, and whether the record-keeping is adequate to keep track of the origin of plant material, labels etc.
Internal audits should be carried out by personnel who are independent of the people directly responsible for the audited activity. The results of the audits and any non-conformities (see section 2.3 and Appendix 2) should be recorded and presented to the producer for review. Corrective action regarding any non-conformities discovered should be implemented promptly and effectively, and documented.
If the audit identifies any critical non-conformities (see section 2.3), the producer or auditor should immediately notify the NPPO of the exporting country in writing and ensure that affected plants for planting are not exported from that place of production until all critical non-conformities are rectified. Immediate corrective actions should be taken under the supervision of the NPPO of the exporting country.
2.2.1.8 Records
Up-to-date records should be maintained and made available to the NPPO of the exporting country and, where justified, also to the NPPO of the importing country. The place of production manual should clearly identify individuals responsible for maintaining various records, and the location and manner in which such records are maintained. Records should be maintained as determined by the NPPO of the exporting country. Records should include date, name and signature of the person who carried out the task or prepared the document. Examples of records that may be required include:
- phytosanitary certificates and other information (e.g. invoices) that substantiate the origin and the phytosanitary status of incoming plant material
- results of the inspection of incoming plant material
- results of audits
- records of examination during production including any pests, damage or symptoms detected and corrective actions taken
- records of pest management measures taken to prevent or control pests (including method of application, product applied, dosage, date of application and, where applicable, duration)
- records of examination of outgoing plant material, including type, quantity of material exported and the name of country of import
- copies of phytosanitary certificates for plant material exported by the producer
- records of non-conformities identified and the corrective or preventive actions taken
- records of personnel responsible for applying pest management measures
- records of personnel training and their qualifications
- copies of the forms used for internal audit reports and checklists
- records necessary to maintain forward and backward traceability of plants for planting from the place of production.
2.3 Non-conformity with requirements for the place of production
A non-conformity is any failure of products or procedures to adhere to the integrated measures set up by the NPPO of the exporting country.
The NPPO of the exporting country should distinguish between two types of non-conformities as follows, taking into account the severity of the non-conformity:
- Critical non-conformities are incidents that compromise the efficacy of the integrated measures utilized at the place of production or increase the risk of infestation of the plants for planting.
- Non-critical non-conformities are incidents that do not immediately compromise the integrated measures or increase the risk of infestation of the plants for planting at the place of production.


Non-conformities can be detected during internal audits, external audits conducted or administered by the NPPO of the exporting country, or as a result of examinations of plant material.
The place of production (or relevant parts thereof) should have its approval withdrawn and exports should be immediately suspended if the NPPO of the exporting country:
- finds a critical non-conformity
- repeatedly identifies non-critical non-conformities
- identifies multiple non-critical non-conformities
- finds that the producer failed to carry out the required corrective actions within the specified time period
- receives a notification of an interception of a pest from the importing country.
Reinstatement should occur only once corrective action has been put into place and an audit by the NPPO of the exporting country has confirmed that the non-conformities have been corrected.
The corrective actions may require a change to the requirements and should include measures to prevent recurrence of the failures identified.
A list of examples of non-conformities can be found in Appendix 2.
3. Responsibilities of the NPPO of the Exporting Country
The NPPO of the exporting country is responsible for:
- communicating importing countries’ requirements to producers
- developing and setting up the requirements for the integrated measures
- approving places of production seeking participation in using integrated measures
- overseeing approved places of production
- carrying out phytosanitary certification to attest that all plants for planting exported by approved places of production meet the phytosanitary import requirements
- providing information on integrated measures developed to the NPPO of the importing country upon request
- granting and facilitating, where justified, visits and audits carried out by the NPPO of the importing country in accordance with section 4.1
- providing adequate information on relevant pest outbreaks to the NPPO of the importing country in accordance with ISPM 17:2002.
3.1 Setting up integrated measures
In developing and setting up its integrated measures, the NPPO of the exporting country should specify the requirements to be met by a producer and the requirements of the importing country or countries. Furthermore, the documentation and communication requirements for the producer should be specified.
3.2 Approval of places of production
Requirements for the approval of places of production that comply with the general integrated measures are described in section 2.1.1.
The requirements for approval of places of production seeking to use additional integrated measures for higher pest risk situations are described in section 2.2.1 and should be based upon:
- an initial documentation audit (including the place of production manual) at the place of production to verify that it is complying with the requirements established according to the pest risk factors of its production  - an implementation audit to verify that:
 the producer complies with the protocols, procedures and standards specified in its place of production manual
 the required supporting documentation is sufficient, current and readily available to personnel
 adequate records and documents are maintained
 internal audits are performed and corrective actions completed
 procedures in place are adequate to ensure that any pest problems are quickly identified and appropriate actions are taken to ensure that only plants that meet the phytosanitary import requirements of the importing country are exported
 either plant material within the place of production has remained free of all quarantine pests or the NPPO was duly informed about infestations of quarantine pests and appropriate measures were taken to ensure that the pest has been eradicated
- the establishment of procedures to meet tolerance levels for regulated non-quarantine pests as required.
Upon successful completion of the documentation and implementation audit, the place of production may be approved by the NPPO of the exporting country to export specific plants for planting to specific countries.
3.3 Oversight of approved places of production
After approval, the NPPO of the exporting country should oversee the place of production, in particular through monitoring or auditing of the production and operational system. The frequency and timing of monitoring or auditing should be determined according to the pest risks, phytosanitary import requirements and the producer’s record of conformity. Monitoring or auditing should include inspection and where applicable, testing of plants for planting, and verification of the documentation and management practices as they relate to the relevant integrated measures.
3.4 Export inspections and issuance of phytosanitary certificates
The integrated measures may reduce the need for the NPPO to undertake growing season inspections and may also reduce the frequency or intensity of export inspections of consignments of plants for planting. A phytosanitary certificate should be issued in compliance with ISPM 12:2011.
3.5 Providing information
The NPPO of the exporting country should provide information on the integrated measures being used to the NPPO of the importing country if required.
4. Responsibilities of the NPPO of the Importing Country
The NPPO of the importing country is responsible for setting and communicating technically justified phytosanitary import requirements. In doing so, the NPPO of the importing country should, before import, consider the factors that affect pest risks specifically associated with plants for planting (refer to Annex 1). The phytosanitary import requirements should be consistent with the identified pest risks.
The NPPO of the importing country should notify the NPPO of the exporting country of any non-compliances (see ISPM 13:2001) that are found upon import or at a later stage in the country of import.
The NPPO of the importing country may also review the system of approval of places of production presented by the NPPO of the exporting country and, where appropriate, conduct audits. The NPPO of the importing country should provide feedback on the results of the reviews, monitoring and audits to the NPPO of the exporting country. 




4.1 Auditing
The NPPO of the importing country may request the NPPO of the exporting country to provide reports on audits undertaken by the producer and by the NPPO of the exporting country. It may also request to audit the integrated measures as developed and set up by the exporting country. This audit may consist of documentation review, inspection and testing of plants produced using integrated measures, and, where appropriate, site visits as a demonstration of the integrated measures used (see ISPM 20:2004) or visits to specific sites provided that there is specific justification, for example in cases of non-compliance (ISPM 13:2001).



This annex is a prescriptive part of this standard.
ANNEX 1: Factors that affect the pest risk of plants for planting
Plant-related factors that affect risk
The initial plant-related pest risk factors to be considered are plant species, cultivar and area of origin. Within any given plant species, there is a range of pest risk associated with the type of plant material moved including, as broadly ranked below from lowest to highest pest risk (recognizing that these rankings may vary depending on specific circumstances):
(1) meristem tissue culture
(2) in vitro culture
(3) budwood/graftwood
(4) unrooted cuttings
(5) rooted cuttings
(6) root fragments, root cuttings, rootlets or rhizomes
(7) bulbs and tubers
(8) bare root plants
(9) rooted plants in pots.
In addition, pest risk may increase with plant age, as older plants have had longer exposure to potential pests.
Production-related factors that affect pest risk
How plants for planting are produced can influence the level of pest risk. These factors may include:
(1) growing media
(2) irrigation method and water source
(3) growing conditions
(4) mixing of different plant species.
In general, use of soil as a growing medium is likely to pose a greater pest risk than a soil-free medium because soil is more likely to carry soil-borne pests (such as micro-organisms, arthropods, nematodes). Sterilization, pasteurization or other effective methods for treating the growing medium prior to planting may manage some pest risk.
The source and quality of irrigation water can affect pest risk. For certain pests spread by water, surface water may pose a greater pest risk than treated water. Likewise the method of irrigation may produce microclimates or conditions favourable for pest development and spread (e.g. overhead rather than drip irrigation).
Examples of growing conditions that may affect pest risk are listed below, broadly ranked from lowest to highest pest risk:
(1) growth chamber
(2) greenhouse
(3) screen house
(4) field grown in containers (pots, tubs etc.)
(5) field grown
(6) plants collected from the wild.
Enclosures such as growth chambers, greenhouses and screen houses usually provide better control over plant material and better opportunity for pest exclusion than field-grown plants. Plants grown in containers with sterilized growing medium or grown on a membrane may afford some protection from soil-borne pests. Field-grown crops are generally subject to cultural and chemical pest control. Plants  collected in the wild are unprotected from pests and potentially are of higher pest risk. Also aquatic plants produced with or without any substrate may carry specific risk for the transmission of pests. Production systems may not fit into one of the above categories and may comprise a combination of several growing conditions (e.g. wild collected plants being transplanted into containers for further growing in the field before export). Certification schemes require specific combinations of these factors and may provide specific safeguards.
Intended uses that affect pest risk
Plants for planting are classified in ISPM 32:2009 as a high pest risk commodity category. Different intended uses that affect the pest risk may include whether plants are grown as annuals or perennials, whether they are grown indoors or outdoors, whether they are grown in urban areas, field or nursery etc.



 This appendix is for reference purposes only and is not a prescriptive part of this standard.
APPENDIX 1: Examples of pest management measures to reduce the pest risk of plants for planting at a place of production
Table 1. Examples of measures that may be applied to reduce the pest risk of plants for planting at a place of production categorized by pest group (pest groups may be overlapping, e.g. groups 1 and 3, and a variety of available measures may be required to adequately address pest risk)
Pest group
Available measures
1
Pests causing latent infections and those that are likely to be transmitted by plants for planting without signs or symptoms
- Derivation from mother plants that have been tested and found free from the relevant pest
- Isolation from sources of infestation (e.g. buffer zone or geographical distance from other host plants, physical isolation using a glasshouse or polytunnel, isolation in time (e.g. growing season) from a source of infestation (temporal isolation))
- Testing of samples of the plants for freedom from pests
- Production within a specified certification scheme or clean stock programme that controls the relevant pests
- Use of indicator plants
- Production of tissue cultures (including meristem tip cultures) which may eliminate pathogens.
2
Pests having stages and symptoms that are visible during the growing season
- Growing season inspection for freedom from pests or symptoms (e.g. at timed intervals, for example monthly for the three months before export or at different growth stages)
- Growing season inspection of the mother plants
- Inspection after harvest to meet a specified tolerance level for a pest (e.g. tolerance for bulb rots by fungi/bacteria)
- Pesticide applications
- Ensuring appropriate conditions for symptom expression
- Production within a specified certification scheme or clean stock programme that controls the relevant pests.
3
Pests spread by contact
- Prevention of contact with sources of infestation (e.g. other plants)
- Hygiene measures for handling pruning tools and equipment between different batches/lots
- Planning of activities in the place of production to work with plants of higher health first
- Use of dedicated clothing and equipment in isolated places (e.g. screen houses)
- Pesticide applications
- Isolation from sources of infestation (e.g. buffer zone or geographical distance from other host plants, physical isolation using a glasshouse or polytunnel, temporal isolation).
4
Pests transmitted by vectors
- Isolation from sources of infestation (e.g. buffer zone or geographical distance from other host plants, physical isolation using a glasshouse or polytunnel, temporal isolation)
- Pre-planting soil testing for freedom from or to meet a tolerance for soil-borne pests or their vectors
- Pesticide treatments for control of insect vectors of pests (e.g. aphids).
5
Pests spread by wind
- Isolation from sources of infestation (e.g. buffer zone or geographical distance from other host plants, physical isolation using a glasshouse or polytunnel)
- Pesticide applications.


 Pest group
Available measures
6
Pests spread by water
- Use of uncontaminated water sources, free of pests
- Irrigation water to be disinfected or sterilized before use or reuse
- Isolation from sources of infestation (e.g. buffer zone or geographical distance from other host plants, physical isolation using a glasshouse or polytunnel, temporal isolation).
7
Soil-borne pests able to colonize the plant
- Isolation from sources of infestation (e.g. buffer zone or geographical distance from other host plants, physical isolation using a glasshouse or polytunnel, growth of plants on raised benches, temporal isolation)
- Derivation from mother plants that have been tested and found free from the relevant pest
- Production within a specified certification scheme or clean stock programme
- Testing of samples of the plants for freedom from pests
- Pre-planting soil treatment or testing for freedom from pests such as fungi, nematodes, viruses transmissible by nematodes
- Use of soil-less growing media.
8
Soil-borne pests in growing medium attached to plants
- Growing medium to be sterilized before use
- Use of inert growing media
- Use of soil-less growing media
- Isolation from sources of infestation, maintenance of plants in such a way that contact with soil is prevented (e.g. on raised benches)
- Pesticide treatment (e.g. drench or fumigation) prior to export
- Roots washed free from growing medium (and repotted in sterile growing medium in a sterile container).
9
Soil-borne pests in soil attached to plants
- Isolation from sources of infestation (e.g. buffer zone or geographical distance from other host plants, temporal isolation)
- Pre-planting soil treatment or testing for freedom from pests (especially nematodes, fungi)
- Pesticide treatment (e.g. drench or fumigation) prior to export
- Roots washed free from soil (and repotted in sterile growing medium in a sterile container).
Table 2. Examples of measures that may be applied to reduce the pest risk of plants for planting based on the type of plant material
Type of plant broadly ranked according to pests risk
Examples of pest types
Available measures
Meristem culture and in vitro culture
Viruses and virus-like diseases, bacteria, fungi, stem nematodes, mites and insects
- Derivation from mother plants that have been tested and found free from the relevant pest
- Cultivation in sterile medium under sealed aseptic conditions
- Testing of samples of the plants for freedom from pests.
Budwood/graftwood
Bacteria and viruses, fungi, insects and other pests
See groups 1 to 7 in Table 1
Unrooted cuttings
Insects, viruses, bacteria, fungi and other pests
See groups 1 to 7 in Table 1
- Hot water treatment.


 Type of plant broadly ranked according to pests risk
Examples of pest types
Available measures
Rooted cuttings
Nematodes, insects, viruses and bacteria and other pests
Measures depend inter alia on the pest risk of the growing medium used.
See groups 1 to 7 in Table 1
Bulbs and tubers, root fragments, root cuttings, rootlets or rhizomes
Nematodes, viruses, bacteria, fungi, insects and other pests
See groups 1 to 7 Table 1
Hot water dipping to control nematodes.
Bare root plants
Nematodes and all other pests of the aerial plant part
See groups 1 to 7 in Table 1
Plants in growing media excluding soil
Nematodes and all other pests of the aerial plant part
See groups 1 to 8 in Table 1
Plants in soil
Nematodes and all other pests of the aerial plant part
See groups 1 to 9 in Table 1



 This appendix is for reference purposes only and is not a prescriptive part of this standard.
APPENDIX 2: Examples of non-conformity
Examples of non-conformity may include the following:
(1) detection of quarantine pests or regulated non-quarantine pests (above set tolerance levels) of concern to the importing country on plants in or from the place of production
(2) failure to undertake required laboratory tests or analyses or correctly follow procedures to identify pests
(3) failure to carry out control measures at the place of production for regulated pests
(4) failure to notify the NPPO of the exporting country of the presence of regulated pests at the place of production
(5) export of ineligible plant taxa, plants from non-authorized origins, or plants not meeting phytosanitary import requirements
(6) failure to correctly list the botanical names of all the plants on documents accompanying consignments
(7) failure to keep consistent pest management records as required in the place of production manual and pest management programme
(8) failure to keep consistent records of country of origin of plant material
(9) failure to undertake ordered corrective actions within the specified time period
(10) failure to perform internal audits as required
(11) operating without adequately trained personnel, designated responsible person or plant protection specialist
(12) significant modification of the place of production manual or pest management practices without prior approval from the NPPO of the exporting country
(13) failure to examine incoming or outgoing plant material
(14) failure to keep plants for planting that have been examined for export separate from other plant material that has not been examined
(15) failure to maintain an effective pest management programme
(16) failure to maintain sanitation management practices at the place of production
(17) failure to periodically provide personnel with relevant training
(18) failure to maintain an up-to-date list and training records of all personnel involved in implementing the place of production manual
(19) failure to consistently sign and date reports or records
(20) failure to record relevant changes to the lists of plant taxa produced, their location in the place of production and the plant material to be exported
(21) failure to detect and record low-level populations of pests
(22) failure to inform the NPPO of the exporting country of any changes to management practices outlined in the place of production manual.



 ISPM 36-20